Thursday, February 28, 2013

Mathematical definitions for 'Zero' and 'Infinity'

Question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130228143155AA70AMc

What are the Mathematical definitions for 'Zero' and 'Infinity'?

Do Mathematical definitions for 'Zero' and 'Infinity' differ from English/philosophical definitions for such terms?

Answer:

Riemann zeta function values relate to Prime numbers

Question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130228142759AA9J7LK

How do Riemann zeta function values relate to Prime numbers?

With reference to Riemann Hypothesis,

First few values of Riemann zeta function for non trivial-zeros:

zeta(z) =
14.134725
21.022040
25.010858
30.424876
32.935062
37.586178
....

The integers closest to these values are 14, 21, 25, 30, 33, 38, 41, 43, 48, 50, ...

They are not prime numbers.

Additional Details

@Henk V,
How do you translate Riemann zeta function values (14, 21, 25, 30, 33, 38,..) in to Prime numbers (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 23, 29, . . .)?

Answer:

Allah consider Muslims as children

Question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130228141231AAxpDDV

Does Allah consider Muslims as children or as slaves?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Rengle said: "and ,we are not Allah children's , we are Allah slaves (servants )..."

http://quran.com/6/101
"... How could He have a son when He does not have a companion and He created all things?"

This implied that Allah to advantage of slaves with no care for their well being (specially in trouble situations).


I said: "No more slaves. Muslims are Allah's adorable children from now on."

The child here is 'state of child' or 'mental state of child' who is dependent on a guardian for guidance. A Master-Slave relationship.

Now Allah takes care of children with kindness and protects them in trouble situations.

Note: Allah is my subject, and I have taken the jurisdiction to judge over Allah.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Additional Details

@Safiyah,
You mentioned the old version.

It is the duty of Allah to implement the superior guidance.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Muslims shall follow Allah's new commands to the letter and whoever ignores them is disrespectful to Allah and will be considered as non Muslim for life.

@Muslim & Proud,
Do you surrender to Allah or just Quran?

Answer:

vegetarianism not permitted to Muslims

Question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130227141231AAziklj

Was vegetarianism not permitted to Muslims by Allah and Quran?

http://www.islamicconcerns.com/IsVegetar…

"According to Islamic Law there are no grounds upon which one can argue that animals should not be killed for food. The Islamic legal opinion on this issue is based on clear Qur'anic verses. Muslims are not only prohibited from eating certain food, but also may not choose to prohibit themselves food that is allowed by Islam. Accordingly vegetarianism is not permitted unless on grounds such as unavailability or medical necessity. Vegetarianism is not allowed under the pretext of giving priority to the interest of animals because such decisions are God's prerogative."

~ Islamic scholar Mawil Izzi Dien

Throughout history numerous Muslims have practiced vegetarianism, in many cases for reasons of piet (example: Sufis)

An early female Sufi, Zaynab, is said to have been persecuted for her refusal to eat meat

Fortunately, now things have changed from beyond the very top of Islam:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Additional Details

@the re - chosen one,
That Quran is now overridden by superior guidance, where animal harm and/or killing is prohibited.

@Ok,
Your bulky comment with references confirm the question description.

The basis for promoting Vegetarianism (without extremes) in aforesaid superior guidance is non-violence towards all living beings, and not likes and/or dislikes to food.

It is the duty of Allah to implement the superior guidance.

Muslims shall follow Allah's new commands to the letter and whoever ignores them is disrespectful to Allah and will be considered as non Muslim for life.

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Note:
If all communities feel Muslims as a danger to them because of violence attitudes "I kill you and I kill animals whom you care about", they would not stand to help you in trouble situations (like for Muammar Gaddafi) and I see the future that it would be the end for Muslims.

Wisdom can win wars and surrender any powerful state, without using lethal weapons and bloodshed.
Otherwise, foolish will live by the sward and dragged to unfair fighting to die by the sward, to the extinct.

It is important for Muslims to know how other communities think about Muslims.

Buddhists and some sects of Hindus who value non violence and do not harm animals, feel uncomfortable about Muslim behavior in neighborhood and discuss within themselves (though not told to face for hospitality reasons) that Muslim community practice primitive values not valued by intelligent humans (simply blood thirsts) and dishonest in Business by abusing the Islam religion.

Muslims have a duty to clear the good name of Allah with right view and by practice.

The aforesaid communities would not accept Muslims as good neighbors if Muslim community continue to justify killings using Quran to disrespect Allah.


Answer:


sandwich is better than Nibbana

Question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130227044534AAWnb4k

Can a sandwich be better than Nibbana in religious Buddhism?

Since Nibbana is nothing and sandwich is something,

As per worldly views:
If "something is better than nothing",
then, "sandwich is better than nibbana".

If "everything is better than something",
then, "everything is better than a sandwich"


As per ultimate truth:
If "nibbana is better than Everything",
then, "nibbana is better than a sandwich"


Now:
If 'worldly view' better than 'ultimate truth' in religious Buddhism,
then, does religious Buddhism aim at a sandwich?

Additional Details

@Seyfert,
Do religious Buddhists use the means of Sammuthi Sacca to justify the ends of Paramatta Sacca or do they wonder around by large, as any other religion would behave with prayers, blessings, etc?

@Fake Genius,
Bliss (Ananda) is the attendant of Buddhi (Buddha).
Therefore Anandan (bliss) cannot be same to Nibbana (freedom).


Answer:


Buddhism considered Aesthsetic?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130224152500AAAFeWe

Why is Buddhism considered Aesthsetic?



Answer:


Please have a look at Buddhist Cosmology:
http://www.energyenhancement.org/31-Planes-of-Existence-Chakras-External-to-Body.jpg

Worldly beings (example: sense world/Kama Loka) deal with the nature of art, beauty, and taste, with the creation and appreciation of beauty. Therefore, mundane (lokika) part of Buddhism is considered Aesthsetic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_cosmology_of_the_Theravada_school#Brahm.C4.81_Planes
Maha Brahma regard himself as the all-powerful, all-seeing creator of the Universe. Buddha surrendered the (worldly creator God concept). 

Statue of Buddha is a visual-aid model to study mind, and not for blind worship. It is like the use of a telescope to look at a distant object.

Buddhism is deep penetration to awaken the mind and open to challenge 'Ehi Passiko'. No blind faith at all.

Buddhism describes reincarnation and rebirth of '5 clinging aggregates' for worldly existence, caused by ignorance 'avijja'.

The ultimate goal of Buddhism is Nibbana (freedom) from all worldly existence. It is not liberation towards a worldly creator.

Better you do further research, instead of concluding with face value on Buddhism. Do not be narrowed to religious aspects.

~ Open Minded Analyst

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Can Muslims be immune to Evil forces

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130227105022AAODQAi

Can Muslims be immune to internal and external Evil forces?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Here on, I bless Allah and Allah's children (Muslims) with kindness.

7th century Quran looks outdated (example: marry slave women) and does not seem to cover the global Muslim population (example: vegetable grow in non desert areas and no need for meat).

It is my wish that the means of Islam shall justify the ends of following superior guidance:

1. Muslims shall live for Allah and shall not die for Allah.

2. Muslims shall not kill and shall not harm any living being including Animals in the name of Allah.

3. Mind precedes all actions. Therefore, 'Halal thinking' shall be non-greed, non-hatred and non-ignorance, where 'Haram thinking' shall be greed, hatred and ignorance.

It is necessary for Muslims to be innocent and not give any stress to neighbors.

If Allah can use kindness without delays to defend Muslims as per my guidance, I will release Allah from my sovereign court.

Additional Details

@Rengle,
No more slaves. Muslims are Allah's adorable children from now on.
Muslims need to be tough minded, and have empathy towards others with soft hearts.

@Rengle,
Allah is my subject and I have lawful jurisdiction over Allah.
Please go and read the "How to judge the subjects of all knowing?" hyperlink reference at the beginning of the question.

@Rengle,
A Muslim is not permitted to pride and verses of Quran do not apply to Allah and Allah's superior.
Allah will take care of you for insulting.


Answer:


Tuesday, February 26, 2013

How to judge the subjects of all knowing?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130225223659AA5iPoy

How to judge the subjects of all knowing?

[az] asked:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

"...Who are you to judge?..."

This is how I judge with lawful jurisdiction:

Muslims assume that Allah accepted their submission.
Likewise, I accept the assumed submission of Allah.

Muslims are Allah's subjects. Likewise, Allah is my subject.
Muslims under-stand Quran and Allah, where I over-stand them.

Muslims cannot know my standing, unless I and/or Allah communicate to them.

Therefore, I have taken the jurisdiction to judge over Allah.


Judgement 1 of my Sovereign Court:
--------------------------------------…

Sura 4:3 of Quran imply that, Muslim men can marry only two or three or four 'slave women'.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

If Muslim men marry other than 'slave women', they will be judged to be abusers of Quran and disrespectful to Allah.

Such marriages will be declared as null and they will be banned forever from Islam (as naughty boys).

All privileges and defenses for immunities as religious Muslims will be removed.

It is the duty of good Muslims to implement my judgement(s). Failing to do so, will be subject to same punishments as above.
I expect corporation from good Muslims to get rid of Muslim imposters to defend the good name of Islam.

My judgement is final and I bless all subjects of all knowing (the one who took refuge under me) for good health and to seek right view.

Additional Details

@Joseph Rose Carpenter,
You cannot know my standing, unless I and/or Allah communicate to you.
I accepted Allah's application to surrender and did not forcefully hijack Allah.

Master is not obliged to prove anything to slaves.
Slave is not permitted pride.

Does Quran teach Muslims to surrender to the will of superior(s) and/or to challenge with pride?

http://quran.com/16/116
"And do not say about what your tongues assert of untruth, "This is lawful and this is unlawful," to invent falsehood about Allah . Indeed, those who invent falsehood about Allah will not succeed."

If you surrender to the will of Allah, you surrender to my wishes as well!



Can Muslims be immune from internal and external Evil forces?
Refer: http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind… 


Answer:

What could Muslims imposters expect in their judgement day?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130225155557AAhXcF0
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130225151949AANaIYV

What could Muslims imposters expect in their judgement day?

[az] asked:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…
"...Who are you to judge?..."

This is how I judge with lawful jurisdiction:

Muslims assume that Allah accepted their submission.
Likewise, I accept the assumed submission of Allah.

Muslims are Allah's subjects. Likewise, Allah is my subject.
You cannot know about it, unless I and/or Allah communicate to you.

Therefore, I have taken the jurisdiction to judge over Allah.

Judgement 1 of my Sovereign Court:

As per Sura 4:3 of Quran, Muslim men can marry two or three or four 'slave women'.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

If Muslim men marry other than 'slave women', they will be judged to be abusers of Quran and disrespectful to Allah.

Such marriages will be declared as null and they will be banned forever from Islam (as naughty boys).

All privileges and defenses for immunities as religious Muslims will be removed.

It is the duty of good Muslims to implement my judgement(s). Failing to do so, will be subject to same punishments as above.

I expect corporation from good Muslims to get rid of Muslim imposters to defend the good name of Islam.

My judgement is final.

Answer:

How to catch God, Devil and Truth in the detail?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130224111040AAqVbrc

How to catch God, Devil and Truth in the detail?

God is in the detail

Devil is in the detail

Truth is in the detail

Additional Details

@Richard,
This question in that section (philosophy, not religion).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_is_in_t…

Answer:

How to compare U.S. Presidents Obama and Bush?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130224105948AAeBFyw

How to compare U.S. Presidents Obama and Bush?

"We're" ... "followers of a murderous ideology that despises freedom and crushes all dissent, and has territorial ambitions and pursues totalitarian aims." ... "We will never back down, we will never give in and we will never accept anything less than complete victory." ... "We will defeat the" ... "hope of freedom across the world."
~ President George W. Bush July 4, 2006

On what aspects can Obama be different to Bush?

Answer:

Does Quran allow Muslim men to marry non-slave girls?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130224090338AAyQPWL

Does Quran allow Muslim men to have many wives, unless they already were slave girls?

http://quran.com/4/3

Sura 4:3 says:
"And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice]."

To deal or not deal justly (by the master), those women should be slaves.
(master-slave relationship)

Focus on "you will not be able to do justice to the orphans":

Therefore, marriage with slave girls is a compensation to them, for master's incompetence.


http://quran.com/4/24
"... So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation. . ..."

The advice for human sex slave trade from: Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.

Are women considered as slaves nowadays for Muslim men to marry?

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/inde…
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 4.
"No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms."

Therefore, as per Quran, all such marriages of Muslim men are null and void, because they do not marry slave girls.

If such marriages are valid, Muslim men shall be condemned and imprisoned under international law for keeping slave girls.

If they do not comply with international laws, the life would be so difficult to them (cannot handle currencies of states who signed for 'The Universal Declaration of Human Rights').

Additional Details

@Miriam,
Do you consider Muslim women as slaves?
Does Quran say or imply that Muslim men can marry non-slave women to them?
If not, Isn't it hypocrisy for Muslims to spread their population all over the world by marrying any woman from any culture?

@林,
Can you confirm your statement "It is permitted within the Islamic religion to have multiple wives, yes, and slaves also" using Quran?
If not, we have no choice other than to conclude that those men as non-Muslims and sex scandals who crookedly abuse Quran for their advantage.

@az,
Current so called Muslim men who have many wives do not live in 7th century and will be judged by current norms and protocols.
"..amazing that a non-Muslim with hardly any knowledge of Islam..." is just moaning when unable to justify the current actions of religious Muslims under the Quran.

@John,
Please answer the question and do not moan with guilt.

@Kiyomi,
Are there provisions in Quran for Muslims to alter it to suit their circumstances?
Otherwise, how can they abuse Quran and challenge Allah in broad day light?
If that is the case, Muslims who involve with many marriages cannot be trusted.

Refer to "How to judge the subjects of all knowing?"
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Answer:

Monday, February 25, 2013

Can 4 wives be satisfied by a Muslim man?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130224080420AAXhGfj

Can 4 wives be satisfied by a Muslim man?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

[Rameen] said:
I am one of three wives, and our husband satisfies all of us very well.
I believe, if Allah gives a man an ability to take care of many many women, then he may have as many wives as he can entertain, and I know I am lucky to call myself his wife.

[Nucleus] said to [Rameen]:
1. Do you know satisfaction is within you and cannot be given by others?
You can take a horse to the water, but you cannot make him drink. The bed will not give you sleep.

2. Can you ever satisfy desire? If you can, one time is enough and no need to repeat jig-jig.

3. As a subject (3rd wife) in his court, you cannot have choice and would parrot his opinion.

Therefore, the credibility of your comment is lost from it's base.

Are you a super-woman to tell us that you experience no trouble (example: jealous) with other women in his court? That also accounts to satisfaction.

If you get my point, you'll conclude that a Muslim man simply CANNOT satisfy any of his wives.

Additional Details

@Lightning from the West,
How can Muslim boy's toy be huge, after cutting into pieces at circumcision?

@Hamza,
Hypocrisy is that they do not and cannot practice what they say.
"he must provide exactly the same for both of them"

http://quran.com/4/129
Sura 4:129
"And you will never be able to be equal [in feeling] between wives, even if you should strive [to do so]. So do not incline completely [toward one] and leave another hanging. And if you amend [your affairs] and fear Allah - then indeed, Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful."

A husband may naturally favor some wives over another one, but he has the option of keeping or divorcing the undesirable wife. The all knowing knows it as well.

@az,
Allah is my subject. Therefore, I am free to judge.

@Joaquim Zorro,
" the stringent laws are too hard to comply by, and mostly avoided by 90% of the Muslims."

Is Quran a full package or half package for Muslims and can they challenge Allah to adjust the Quran to suit their circumstances?

@John,
Where is the answer to the question?

Answer:

Can a religious Muslim man satisfy 4 wives?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223163629AAd9qS8

Can a religious Muslim man satisfy 4 wives?

There was a halal hamster in a UK farm who got off from it's cage and impregnated hundreds of haram female hamsters, all night.

Unfortunately, he lost his halal strength and suffocated to death by the sun rise.

(This tragedy was broadcasted by BBC, few years back.)

Moral of the story is, be careful when entertaining many wives!

I've seen Muslim men walking in the morning like puncture tires.
Sometimes, their ears are full of gossip. You know what 4 women can do...

Does Allah know how weak Muslim men get after all?

Additional Details

@Rameen,
1. Do you know satisfaction is within you and cannot be given by others?
You can take a horse to the water, but you cannot make him drink. The bed will not give you sleep.

2. Can you ever satisfy desire? If you can, one time is enough and no need to repeat jig-jig.

3. As a subject (3rd wife) in his court, you cannot have choice and would parrot his opinion.

Therefore, the credibility of your comment is lost from it's base.

Are you a super-woman to tell us that you experience no trouble (example: jealous) with other women in his court? That also accounts to satisfaction.

If you get my point, you'll conclude that a Muslim man simply CANNOT satisfy any of his wives.

Answer:

Can Muslim men satisfy 4 wives?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223160927AAHILbt

Can Muslim men satisfy 4 wives?

There was a halal hamster in a UK farm who got off from it's cage and impregnated hundreds of haram female hamsters, all night.

Unfortunately, he lost his halal strength and suffocated to death by the sun rise.

(This tragedy was broadcasted by BBC, few years back.)

Moral of the story is, be careful when entertaining many wives!

I've seen Muslim men walking in the morning like puncture tires.
Sometimes, their ears are full of gossip. You know what 4 women can do...

Does Allah know how weak Muslim men get after all?

Answer:

Why Muslims suffer inhumanly by Sharia Laws?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223115706AA5aIMn

Why do Muslims suffer inhumanly by Sharia Laws?

Muslims surrender to Sharia law.

It is a human judgement system with inhuman punishments in the name of Allah.

The recent popular incident is Rizana's murder (she being a minor) by the Saudi Government using Sharia Law.

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=212…

This incident also raise the question, why do Muslims fake true age in birth certificates as a common practice (with knowledge of parents and Islamic religious leaders)? There are many age incidents, even at schools and sports events. Is it part of Sharia law?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQjDfX7s0…

Muslims in Sri Lanka openly condemned Saudi Government for murdering Rizana's death with convincing reasons.

But, they failed to condemn such barbaric Islamic laws (even tried to hide the incident when questioned in public media conferences), because they could not behave sensibly as their religion was involved.

Why do Muslims hesitate to value humanity irrespective of whatever written on paper?
Don't tell me, Quran is always spoken from Allah's mouth, by holding a paper based Quran on your hand.

My dear Muslim brothers and sisters, do you voluntarily let your hand cut for any act you do, just because you surrender to anyone?
It is hard for me to tolerate the violence against fellow human.

Please, speak from your hearts without being dishonest to yourself.

Additional Details

لا إله إلا الله I❤ISLAM,
Judgement is partial to the code you follow. My judgement (superior to Sharia law) is she needed support and guidance with kindness, even if she acted with intentions to harm others.
Violence to violence is not admired by wise and not the correct answer.
Two Wrongs Make a Right is a Fallacy. Therefore, Sharia law is a fallacy!
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index…

@Kenneth,
This is not a session to compare religions, but to appreciate good human values.

@Dila,
Thank you for your kindness.
This Muslim teenager (Rizana) was tortured in the dessert before forcing to accept and was not given a lawyer or at least a proper interpreter/translator. It is a one way justice and whoever has power can hide their evil acts behind this devil's law. This need to be stopped.

لا إله إلا الله I❤ISLAM,
If you are surrendered to Sharia Law, your judgements are definitely inferior to my judgements.
It is my wish that Sharia law and Saudi Arabia be condemned for inhuman acts.
Master has spoken!.

Answer:

Can Quran peacefully unite all Muslims?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223105755AA5a9kG

Can the Holy Quran peacefully unite all Muslims using all the powers of Allah?

We observe deadly fighting within Muslim communities by using Sharia punishments and in the name of Allah.

Some cut noses, ears, hands, necks and stone the women, burn alive, etc

It is a disgrace to humanity! Don't you think so?

Additional Details

@Vadim Khan,
I concern for humanity and do not consider it as a wastage.
Attack is your opinion, and defend is mine opinion.

@Ibrahim,
I had consideration for such punishments and found useless.
Revenge is a vicious cycle and no one learns anything other than violence by large.

@Dila,
When would that happen (rightfully follow it) for the sake of non-violence?

@John,
Did my question and its description take context out of sharia law? no.
What is the point of beating your own dummy, when true enemy is out there to destroy humanity?
Better you do an investigation to find out why those Muslim communities kill each other with low self esteem by using Sharia punishments, Quran and in the name of Allah. You cannot deny inhuman violence. Can intelligent Muslims guide these fools to value humanity? Otherwise, good people are getting hurt when intellectual scriptures are used to justify such 3rd grade acts.

Answer:

Why do back-row guys kneel to Bottoms in Religious Prayers?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223104144AAmNbun

Why do back-row guys kneel to Bottoms in Religious Prayers?

I could not believe my eyes when I saw, the back-row guys kneel at the Bottoms of front row guys.

Holly-A's aimed like cannons or multi barrel rocket launchers at them!

http://www2.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploa…

It is impossible to evaluate the damage, if things get fired...

Is it Religious to do so?

Additional Details

[Vadim Khan] is saying to racist cowards (I think his buddies) that kneeling in front of Holly-A's is called praying. They will consider your words, if you say so by experience...

Answer:

Does Allah prevent Muslims from worldly suffering?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223100541AAc3PXx

Does Allah the almighty prevent Muslims from worldly suffering?

Māra's is Mr. Death, the tempter for repeat birth (existence), where the born is subject to worldly suffering (Aging, Sorrow, Lamentation, Pain, Grief, Despair and Death).

Ignorance (no science) is the cause of existence.

Māra has 3 daughters:
Taṇhā (Craving), rati (lust), and Raga (Passion), the must formula to give birth to more and more worldly beings, who are subject to suffering.

It is not a secret that Muslims are in the mission of population growth (with conflicts all over the world), using Quran as the divine guidance.

Can Quran guide to free all Muslims from worldly sufferings (a wise mission)?

If not be wise, US will do as per Allah's will. http://quran.com/4/90

Additional Details

@Med,
Can the Holy Quran peacefully unite all Muslims using all it's powers?
We hear deadly fighting within Muslim communities using Sharia punishments.

Aren't the Muslims who surrender to human judgements in the name of Allah that suffer from such inhuman laws?

@John,
Life is short. Do you need suffer tests or a way to get rid of suffering?

@Fake Genius,
I suggest my fellow human Muslim brothers and sisters to frame your comment with gold!
Thank you for sharing wisdom. I honestly appreciate.

@John,
Muslims do moan when they face worldly suffering by throwing the personal reasoning in to Allah's account. If Allah promotes birth, can he take care of the suffering that follows with it?

Answer:

Do Muslims kneel to U.S. because of Allah's wish?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223094239AAPnazL

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223101135AAOAbD1

Do Muslims in Afganistan, Iraq, etc surrender and kneel to U.S. because of Allah's wish?

http://quran.com/4/90

"...And if Allah had willed, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they remove themselves from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allah has not made for you a cause [for fighting] against them."

Answer:

we all share a single mind ?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130223090942AAGJpH1

Do we all share a single mind by creating egoistic selves?

Is it your mind, my mind, its mind and their/our minds or just mind?

Answer:

religious minds accept on face value?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222045815AAObbue

Why do religious minds accept on face value?

For example:
Religious minds Just believe in God and surrender. Full stop.
Why? They don't know, but will tell any reason that comes to mouth or pointing to a piece of paper.

http://turnbull.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~histor…

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

What if be able to entertain the thoughts valued by religions without accepting them?

Additional Details

@Gregory,
Do you always like to a slave to your own thoughts?

@G C,
If the examiner who understand (stand under) the bible is part of the universe, isn't that validation subjective? How do you objectively validate universe, unless you are outside the said universe?
Honestly, I can objective validate any universe and it's creator God, since both are mind born.

Answer:

How do mathematicians know infinity?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222044815AA29rRK

How do mathematicians know infinity?

To Thales the primary question was not "what do we know", but "how do we know it."

The prejudiced mathematicians may claim to know infinity and even teach to students.

The primary question is how do they know it?

Additional Details

How do they know to construct infinite sets?
How do they know cardinality of infinite sets?
How do they compare infinities?
Surely, infinity must be finitely defined to do all those constructing, counting and comparing.
Don't you think so?

@RockIt,
Is universe finitely defined for mathematicians to play with it?

Answer:

mathematicians blindly use infinity

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222033108AA5rY9f

Do mathematicians use infinity blindly, or concern seriously about infinity?

http://turnbull.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~histor…

“Our account does not rob mathematicians of their science, by disproving the actual existence of the infinite in the direction of increase, in the sense of the untraceable. In point of fact they do not need the infinite and do not use it. They postulate any that the finite straight line may be produced as far as they wish.” ~ Aristotle.

The mathematicians use infinity very irresponsibly in infinite series like a youth throws all garbage under his own bed to hide from others.

Caught garbage will haunt the mathematicians one day.

Same is discussed in this math paper relevant to Riemann Hypothesis:
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journal…

When the infinity considered in mathematics is proven to be finite in a new paper, the current mathematicians' prejudice will be stripped to bear naked in public.
Wait and see!

Additional Details

@Josephinine,
The universe that consist everything is finite and subject to change (impermanent) as well as the mathematical infinity. Have patience until it be convinced with proof in a new math paper.

@Randy P,
Cantor only saw the Mathematical infinity, not the true infinity (freedom/nibbana).
He was condemned by then mathematicians as the scientific charlatan, renegade and corrupter of youth. Now the new generation is begging to learn from him.
The so called current mathematicians neither see math infinity nor the true infinity. They just guess and teach students like the blind preach about colors.
It is a dogmatic institutional view to say that only a math course can teach you math, when math is everywhere in existence.

If you are a prejudiced mathematician, please try to fasten the belt holding your trouser because your students are watching. Sadly, it might not last long.

@Ben,
Thank you for your example.
If 9.99999.... is between mathematical zero and mathematical 10 as a whole, and since 10 is finite, then mathematical infinity is finitely defined.
There's another issue here. 0.9999... is a sub universe inside the 0 to 10 universe. We can compare different universes.
In analytical continuation mathematicians unknowingly consider universes that change their sizes within a finite range (constant universe), if not they throw garbage in to fixed universes to haunt them. Both ways, they are irresponsible, since the boundaries are not predefined.
It doesn't matter how beautiful sand castles are, as long as they get washed off to the tide of true wisdom.

Answer:

finite encloses an infinite

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222031427AA1OzkM

Does finite encloses an infinite series?

"Even as the finite encloses an infinite series
And in the unlimited limits appear,
So the soul of immensity dwells in minutia
And in the narrowest limits no limit in here.
What joy to discern the minute in infinity!
The vast to perceive in the small, what divinity!"

by Jacob Bernoulli, who introduced 'constant e' to mathematics; Ars Conjectandi.

Answer:

Love the surrender state

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222022342AAydl7h

Is Love the surrendered state, according to Buddhism?

Love is a blessing (positive curse).

Failing 'to love others' (to surrender others) and failing 'to be loved by others' (to be surrendered to others) are the situations where the sparks of war arise.

Freedom is to get rid of worldly states as of 'to love' and 'to be loved'.

Worldly beings
1. attract (Loba) to more power states (to be surrendered/ to be loved by them) and

2. repel (Dosa/Dvesa) when such states get weak, with attempt (to surrender/to love them) less power states.

3. Moha is the ignorance to (allow the above 2 states without considering their resulting sufferings).

In the absence of Loba, Dosa and Moha, the worldly beings attain freedom (nibbana).

The means of worldly love that justifies the ends of freedom shall be the journey of truth seeker!

Additional Details

@sanity, Is compassion an attribute of a being withing worldly realms, where Nibbana is not?

@dWali,
Can God love you, if you do not open the door of your heart to him?
Love and be loved are mutual/repel effects.
Mr.A surrenders Ms.B by creating an account in his self book to dream about her. Ms B does the simile in her own dreams. Ms. B surrenders her account to Mr.A and be a slave for being in love and complains that Mr. A controls her. What a tragedy!

@fatsausage,
Agree. Fxxk and to be Fxxked are to surrender and to be surrendered in the name of love.

@dWali,
Beings achieved total nibbana cannot know so.
LOVE is not wrong for worldly being if you read the question completely regarding means and ends.
Otherwise, ignorantly continue suffering.

@Fake Genius,
Though you initially disagreed to 'Love as the surrendered state', the body of your comment confirmed it. ~ becomes "mine"!
Does complete Nibbana (not ariya, pure one) got any business (like compassionate love, or metta) to do with worldly beings?

Answer:

infinity vs divinity in Mathematics?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222014643AAkc4wl

What is the difference between infinity vs di+v+inity in Mathematics?

"Even as the finite encloses an infinite series
And in the unlimited limits appear,
So the soul of immensity dwells in minutia
And in the narrowest limits no limit in here.
What joy to discern the minute in infinity!
The vast to perceive in the small, what divinity!"
Ars Conjectandi

'infinity vs divinity' was considered by Jacob Bernoulli, who introduced 'constant e' to mathematics.

Divinity is the state of things that come from a supernatural power or deity, such as God.

The whole divided by infinity results in infinitesimal! All are finite!!

Does God use 3 universes, to divide (one whole universe) by (infinite parts of another universe), resulting into (an infinitesimal part of the 3rd universe)?

Hah! that explains that the essence of God's divine nature is love and righteousness.

Additional Details

@Zero State,
God is the creator of ideas in mind, where God creates universe and worlds with thoughts.
Do you consider mathematical zero in division as a delta (infinitesimal)?

@MTR 2.0,
I agree, even if you have guessed it.
Can you elaborate the fractal relevance to the question?


Answer:

whole is more than the sum of its parts?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130222003740AArXM4e

Why did Aristotle say that The whole is more than the sum of its parts?

Law of Conservation of Mass (out of the box view):
"matter cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system."
"Mass of things before reaction = Mass of things after reaction"

http://turnbull.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~histor…

The whole is more than the sum of its parts.
Metaphysica 10f-1045a

"It has been said: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. It is more correct to say that the whole is something else than the sum of its parts, because summing up is a meaningless procedure, whereas the whole-part relationship is meaningful." (Kurt Koffka, 1935: New York: Harcourt-Brace. p 176)

Is it because of partial opinion, disregarding the existence of 'meta part (sum)' within the whole?
For example: Child of a group of 5 count as "I and 1,2,3,4"

Additional Details

@Andrew Smith,
A snow crystal does not have the same parts as humidity in the air, because the difference is heat.

@Robert J,
How does your comment address the question?


Answer:

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Can a Muslim marry all 3 daughters of Mr. Mara

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130221110107AAXoqJx

Can a Muslim marry all 3 daughters of Mr. Mara when a Buddhist has no interest to them?

Islam allows a man to marry up to four women.
Is it also permissible for a Muslim man to marry a non-Muslim woman?

Mr. Mara's 3 sexy daughters are:
1. Ms. Thanha,
2. Ms. Rathi and
3. Ms. Raga

Anyone interested to take care of them?

Additional Details

@John Quill,
Are they the attributes/values of any just society/community and individual, irrespective of religion, to stand up to challenge?
But, why do some Muslim attitudes towards non-Muslims, interpretations of Quran and tactical conversions to Islam give lawful reasons for continuous US attacks?
'Live by the sward and Die by the sward' may not be a wise man's choice.

Do you want to marry with Māra's (Mr. Death, the tempter for repeat birth meaning existence, where every born will die) daughters Taṇhā (Craving), rati (lust), and Raga (Passion) to expand Muslim population all over the world?

Why not free all Muslims from worldly sufferings, when Allah does not prevent you from suffering?

Do Muslims surrender and kneel to U.S. in Afganistan, Iraq, etc because of Allah's wish?
 
Answer:

Where do Maras abode?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130221104757AAuApVT

Where do Maras abode in Buddhist Cosmology?

Samyutta Nikāya > Khandha Vagga > Radha Samyutta > Mara Sutta

Mara is anything that obstructs the attainment of enlightenment.
He is a tempter making the mundane alluring (negative) seem positive.
Desire Realm (Kāmadhātu) is under the domination of Māra and bound by sensual desire, resulting it's beings to suffering.

There are five types of symbolic Maras:
1. Kilesa Mara :
as the defilements (lobha,disa,moha)/ unskillful emotions that poisons mind.
2. Abhisankhara Mara :
as meritorious, demeritorious and imperturbable (anenja) creations
3. Khandha Mara :
as the entirety (5 aggregates) of conditioned existence.
4. Maccu Mara :
as the demon of death, whose followers are aging and illness. (we fear)
5. Devaputta Mara :
as son of a deva (god) seeking pleasure

http://www.energyenhancement.org/31-Plan…

Buddhist Cosmology - 31 Planes of Existence mentions 'Paranimmita-vasavatti', the heaven of devas 'with power over (others') creations'
The ruler of this world is called Vasavatti.

This world is also home to Devaputta Māra, who endeavors to keep all beings of the Kāmadhātu in the grip of sensual pleasures.

Do other 4 Māras (Kilesa Mara, Abhisankhara Mara, Khandha Mara, Maccu Mara) also dwell at 'Paranimmita-vasavatti'?

Can Māra influence higher abodes like Mahābrahmā, Brahmapurohita, Brahmapārisajja?

Additional Details

@Seyfert,
Are there any references to Mara's influencing to Mahabrahma?
 
 
Answer:

can a Police Officer response out of Job Description?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130219235422AA8e1oS

How can a Police Officer response for what is not in the Job Description?

Police Officer is a fiction defined on paper having certain attributes, job duties, etc.

As per the job description, human feelings like smile, anger, cry are not paid duties of a police officer.

Police conduct is to follow only what is trained to do (within the limits of job description). If not, it is dishonor to the status and will be subject to disciplinary actions.

Suppose you slap (or kick) a duty-minded police officer.

On what basis can the police officer lawfully response and for who's complaint?

Additional Details

@ali,
If you slap or kick a police officer as a symbol to show love,
How can a police officer response to love?

What if I change the terms? slap=flying kiss and kick=crawling kiss
Now, can those so called 'written laws' you mentioned bite?

@shortie,
I do not buy the 'assaulting a police officer' suggestion.
Since 'police officer' is a fiction defined on paper, it can arrest another fiction, not a living breathing people with flesh and blood. (slave cannot challenge the master).
I would say, it is my wish that the 'police officer' rotate 180 degrees.

Answer:

Can Nibbana achieved by any living being

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130219231858AARZb9G

Can Nibbana in Buddhism be achieved only by breathing people OR by any living being in any system?

Any living being in any system means for example, fictional citizens defined in a constituted society.

Can all beings/existence free from worldly systems?

Answer:

trapped vs sleep on a trap

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130219223803AAQIKEr

What is the difference between (caught in a trap) and (sleep on a trap) according to Buddhism?

Suppose an ignorant Rabbit who cannot see the trap, gets caught to it.
When hunter comes, the Rabbit becomes food.

Suppose a wise Deer who can see the trap, sleeps (take rest) on it (not trapped).
When hunter comes, the Deer jumps up and leaves the site by teasing the hunter.

Answer:

Super-Mundane Buddha appear at Mundane worlds?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130219220415AAeIyBT

How does Super-Mundane Buddha appear at Mundane worlds?

The baby Prince (no name, not Buddha) announcement:
"Aggo hamasmi lokassa - Jettho hamasmi lokassa - Settho hamasmi lokassa - Ayamanthima jathi - Natthi dani punabbhavo."
"I am the Chief/highest in the world - There is no equal to me - I am Supreme - This is my last birth - No rebirth for me."

How does an ordinary being (before awakened) be highest (Aggo) in the world (lokassa)?

Immediately after Enlightenment the Buddha uttered:
"... My mind has reached the unconditioned (i.e., Nibbana); the end of craving (Arahatta Phala) has been attained." meaning super-mundane 'Lokottara'
Dhammapada Verses 153 and 1541 - Udana Vatthu

In almost all suttas (example: preamble of Atanatiya Sutta), Buddha appear at mundane (lokika) Manussa Loka, Deva Loka and Brahma Loka to preach/discuss Dhamma.

How does super-mundane (lokottara) allow Buddha to appear at mundane (lokika) worlds?

Additional Details

@Seyfert,
Can a mundane being gain foresight to predict super-mundane Nibbana?

Answer:

Can Buddha exist and subject to death?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130219144340AAA4RYr

Can Buddha exist and subject to death?

The popular Buddhist history states something like:
1. Buddha was a man who attained enlightenment.
2. He spent (existed) 45 years of his life preaching Dhamma.
3. At the age of 81, Buddha died.

Paticca-samuppada-vibhanga Sutta states:
Ignorance causes existence and subject to Decay, Death, Sorrow, Lamentation, Pain, Grief, and Despair.

Can Buddha (Awakened/ full enlightened) exist and subject to death?

Why contradictions in the popular shadow/projected story as Buddhism?

Why not study Buddhism as it is (abstract form has no contradictions)?

Additional Details

@Fake Genius,
I think, you's answer does not directly address the question.
Every moment birth & death occur. Existence is a series of births & deaths.
How can Buddha continue to exist (subject to birth & death) for 45 years?

Answer:

Does patience mean delay?

Question:

Does patience mean delay?

Is patience separate from Forgive, Forget, Revenge ?

Is patience a burden to carry an unsolved problem?

Additional Details

@Fake Genius,
It is also possible to use patience for revenge.
(Not to react in a week situation that gets you into trouble. Patience until the right moment comes)
As the old saying goes... "Live today and fight tomorrow"

It is not wise to continue to carry suffering/pleasure with patience.


Answer:

Why Buddhist knowledge is ethical?

Question:

Why Buddhist knowledge is ethical?

Additional Details

@M S,
Are the use of Telescope to see distance objects and uses diagrams/models to illustrate when studying, rational to you? Likewise, Buddhist statues are used as visual models of mind to study the concepts in Dhamma. Is that rational to you?

@Rogue Citrine,
There are 'kusala' and 'gnana' in Buddhism, regarded as knowledge.
Why are they ethical?

@Fake Genius,
What about the consideration for 'Aloha, Adosa, Amoha' in such knowledge?



Answer:

Can the Scientific Method generate new Knowledge?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130218141931AAAps2h

Can the Scientific Method generate new Knowledge?

Scientific method in short is: to conclude the observations as they are (without altering).

1. Hypothesis
2. Collect Data
3. Experiment
4. Observe results
5. Conclude whether hypothesis is true or false by comparing with observations.

Since observations are concluded as they are, can Scientific Method generate any new Knowledge?


Answer:

knowledge of knowledge

Question:

What is knowledge of knowledge?

Plato famously defined knowledge as "justified true belief."

Bertrand Russell's "Theory of Knowledge" illustrates the difficulty in defining knowledge:

"At first sight, knowledge might be defined as belief which is in agreement with the facts.

The trouble is that no one knows what a belief is,
- no one knows what a fact is, and
- no one knows what sort of agreement between them would make a belief true. "


Answer:

Best Experiment in Buddhism?

Question:

What is the Best Experiment in Buddhism?

With reference to AriyaPariyesana Sutta,
(the difference between noble search and ignoble search)

A being who is subject to old age, illness and death,

1. search about: birth, aging, illness,death (mortality)?
or
2. search about: unborn, aging-less, illness-less, deathless (immortality), etc ?

Do believers of creator God concept (including submission & salvation) experiment on mortality or immortality?

Additional Details

@Ibi,
Honestly, I do not agree, because such existence is pure ignorance.
I seek freedom, not surrendering or binding to anyone.

@liaqat k,
I wish you answer the question, not divert to do shameless marketing.


Answer:

Brain relates to Mind

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130218125758AA1LBGQ

Does conventional science say that (Brain is Mind) or (Mind dwells only in Brain) or (Brain relates to Mind)?


Answer:

sense Space and Time without concepts in mind?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130218124837AAhVA14

Can we sense Space (position, line) and Time using 5 organs without assumed concepts in mind?

The Five Sense Organs are: eye, ear, nose, tongue, skin.

Are original space-time mind born?

Answer:

know for sure that 'Universe' exist?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130218123733AAQv2DS

How do you know for sure that 'Universe' exist?

What is the method to know (prove beyond doubt) that Universe exist?

Additional Details

@John W,
Is universe a mind made/defined assumption used as a convention?

@scott,
How can you be sure that out your window, that is part of the Universe?

@Luke,
It is a pity to see comments of the products of western education system. Basics are missing!

@Chris Pitchr,
There's a very important point in this question.
We first come to know 'universe' by a definition idea (in mind) for what universe is. Without defining universe (name & description), how can we identify anything as a universe? Even NASA is based on such a mind-based definition for universe.
Who created Universe? God (mind)
Who created God? mind (as a definition)
Never underestimate the power of mind. You cannot think, what you cannot think. Everything you can think are nothing but thoughts!


Answer:

pseudo-scientists

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217164607AAI0omQ

Is science stymied by ignorance, deception and muddled by pseudo-scientists?

The pseudo-scientist is described by the Spanish philosopher, Jose Ortega, in his stunning book on modern western civilization, The Revolt of the Masses:

"... By 1890 a third generation takes command in the intellectual world, and we find a type of scientist without precedent in history. He is a person who knows, of all that a routinely dutiful man must know, only something of one specific science; even of this science, he is well informed only within that limited area in which he is an active researcher. He may even go so far as to claim he has an advantage in not cultivating what lies outside his own narrow field, and he may declare that curiosity about general knowledge is the sign of the amateur, the dilettante.

Immured within his small area, he succeeds in discovering new facts, advances the science which he scarcely knows, and increases perforce the encyclopedia of knowledge of which he is conscientiously ignorant..."


Answer:

rejected when presenting a new idea

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217155216AAuDTFB

Have you ever being rejected when presenting a new idea by challenging the conventions?

For example: prove that different infinities are observable and comparable.

How would you respond to it?

Charlotte Bronte humorously wrote about ironic flaw of human nature in her popular novel, Shirley.

Whenever you present the actual, simple, truth, it is somehow always denounced as a lie:
they disown it, cast it off, throw it on the parish; whereas the product of your own imagination, the mere figment, the sheer fiction, is adapted, termed pretty, proper, sweetly natural:
the little spurious wretch gets all the comfits - the honest, lawful bantling all the cuffs. Such is the way of the world...".

Additional Details

@Polyhymnio,
Georg Cantor who calculated with different infinities was condemned as a "scientific charlatan", a "renegade" and a "corrupter of youth" with no empathy at that time and as a result of stress, he died in a mental institution.

@Fred,
Georg Cantor was a pioneer, who took Math to another level. It is unfortunate for an intelligent math society to be so cruel to hunt-down a fellow thinker. That tradition remains to-date. I agree that some friends looked after him. But, once the heart is torn apart to loose faith in the society, no other friend can help him. He did not know how to clear his mind from unnecessary stress.
Bipolar, manic-depression is just psychological fantasy, a legal punishment tactic for social condemnation.


Answer:

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Is it worth the risk to create chaos?

Question:http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217152805AAjZ7tn

Is it worth the risk to create chaos from which knowledge evolves?



Answer:

Does everything occur in life for reasons?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217151537AASwSAC

Does everything occur in human life for a set of reasons?

Is it our work to observe and understand these set of reasons?

If everything in life is occur for a set of reasons, is life meaningless?

Answer:

Why we change yet we remain the same?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217150127AARS5l2

Why we change yet we remain the same?


Answer:

Why F-u-c-k is vulgar?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217144054AAec0Uv

Why the English word F-u-c-k in human sense is considered as vulgar?

It literally means the act of sexual intercourse. A human activity like eat, drink, walk, talk, etc.
Why hide it, even for children?
A child has rights to know the origin of his existence, instead of being deceived by fairy tale stories.
If so damaging or offending anyone, why this term is available in every respectable English dictionary?

In a dialect of English language, if this term is synonymously defined for 'chair', would you say, "Pull a xxxx and have a seat?"

Similar soundings like FARC Guerrillas in Colombia and abbreviations like FCUK are commonly used in general media.

We are human, not robots. Why unnecessary caution among human for this cute four letter word?

Answer:

Why Life appear to be futile with no meaning in sight?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217140414AAB1vUd

Why does the Life appear to be futile with no meaning in sight?

We find ourselves surrounded by a sea of chaos.

Life then carries us through this sea of confusion, never stopping anywhere to drop us at a destination.

Answer:

What makes man act, think, feel, move and function?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217140119AAarBVn

What makes man act, think, feel, move and function?

Additional Details

@Hope is certainty,
If I say the cause is Ignorance, would you agree?

Answer:

Incredible Division prove different Infinities

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217132342AAQdNDV

How does Incredible Division prove the existence of different Infinities?

Additional Details

(cardinality of Infinity in dimension-1) is compared to (cardinality of Infinity in dimension-2) at the dimension-3.
Can this be explained in different ways in detail?

'Baseless Riemann Hypothesis' math paper uses such infinity comparisons:
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journal…


Answer:

Why Bible say that Every firstborn son will die?

Question:

Why does Bible say that Every firstborn son will die?

Exodus 11:5
Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sits on the throne, to the firstborn son of the slave girl, who is at her hand mill, and all the firstborn of the cattle as well.

Exodus 4:23
and I told you, "Let my son go, so he may worship me." But you refused to let him go; so I will kill your firstborn son.'"

Exodus 12:12
On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn--both men and animals--and I will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. I am the LORD.

Exodus 12:29
At midnight the LORD struck down all the firstborn in Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh, who sat on the throne, to the firstborn of the prisoner, who was in the dungeon, and the firstborn of all the livestock as well.

Psalm 78:51
He struck down all the firstborn of Egypt, the firstfruits of manhood in the tents of Ham.

Psalm 105:36
Then he struck down all the firstborn in their land, the firstfruits of all their manhood.

Psalm 135:8
He struck down the firstborn of Egypt, the firstborn of men and animals.

Psalm 136:10
to him who struck down the firstborn of Egypt His love endures forever.

Is this humanity referencing to current conventions?


Answer:

did Buddha boast?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217115914AA8FbWS

If Buddha was human in popular history, did he boast?

The popular Buddhist history states something like:
"Siddhartha Gotama, the historical Buddha, was an actual man born in India 2500 years ago."
http://www.geocities.com/lesliebarclay/b…

If Buddhist Dhamma is preached/accepted by Buddha, the said Dhamma states 'The Nine Special Qualities of the Buddha'.

http://www.tbsa.org/articles/BuddhaQuali…

Boasting means, talk with excessive pride and self-satisfaction about one's achievements, possessions, or abilities.

If Buddha was a man, did he do self admiring by any means?

Additional Details

@Cleo,
Irrespective of popular mundane history, should Buddha be viewed through Dhamma, as the Doctor to cure the existence of five clinging aggregates 'sabbe saththa bhawanthu sukhithathta'?
If so, the boasting argument in this question would not be valid.

Answer:

Is Buddhism the true science to achieve Immortality?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217111605AAAV8tP

Is Buddhism the true science to achieve Immortality for a living being?

http://salient.org.nz/columns/five-great…

Immortality is one of the unsolved mysteries in so called science innovation (it is ignorance 'avijja' relative to Buddhism, causing existence 'sankhara')

Mortal means the state of being subject to death.

All worldly beings are subject to death.

Nibbana in Buddhism is the freedom from worldly existence. (super-mundane)

Therefore, is Nibbana in Buddhism, the one and only true immortality (not subject to death)?

Additional Details

@Matthew,
The false assumption of a permanent creator concept 'Maha brahma' who thought himself as all-powerful, all-seeing creator of the Universe and salvation/liberation to it are Temporal, and such origination is ignorance. The wisdom in Buddhism is far beyond it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_co…

Answer:

If free to suicide how to plan it?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217105556AAmCIEX

If free to suicide how to plan it?

We are Born To Die. (fairy-tale psychology cannot hide the truth)

We suffer in life (in sickness, old age, near death, etc), and not in death (if not relative to life).

Death occurs in different ways.
Time, place and method of death can happen with or without our fore-knowledge.

In UK, 'The rule of law whereby it is a crime for a person to commit suicide is hereby abrogated' meaning suicide is not an offense by state law.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz…

If you have freedom to choose death as per your wish, how do you plan death?

Do you have reasons to postpone death?

Additional Details

@Krla,
Scared to loose the greed and illusions of life, but justify dishonestly?

@Vanity,
Do you make effort to enjoy life, because you are not satisfied with it?
If your bucket is full, why try to fill more?

Answer:

include in the Bucket-List

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217095843AAcLasU

What would you include in the Bucket-List?

To 'kick the bucket' is an English idiom that is defined as 'to die'.

Therefore, 'Bucket List' are 'things to do before you die'.

What would you include in your Bucket-List?
It will give a purpose for life.

Additional Details

@Citrine Dream,
What about learning/experiencing 'how to overcome life's existence'?

Answer:

forgive and forget the difference between Christianity and Buddhism

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130217095106AAeJYpK

Is forgive and forget the difference between Christianity and Buddhism?

God forgives the sins of Christians using Jesus to continue existence.
Forgiveness to bad-debts is a double entry transaction.
Therefore, the logged double-entry transaction will not be forgotten.

In contrast, Nibbana in Buddhism is super-mundane, away from worldly existence.
Nibbana nullifies all worldly transactions (sins & merits).
The recorded Forgiveness has no meaning, if the whole-thing is forgotten.


When you suffer from a situation, how would you handle in general?

1. revenge the culprit who caused you to suffer

2. forgive the culprit (but nothing is forgotten)

3. forget the situation (clear the mind)

Additional Details

@planner,
When God forgives sins of an account (suppose the person you assume as self) through the blood of Jesus, it is logged and God (like IMF) does not forget it.
I agree that forgiven sins will be as far away from you as the east is from the west. In other words, that they never pertain to you again.

@Fake Genius,
(just a friendly speech) If someone kicks your butt, just because both of you will die someday, how else would you respond other than, forgive, forget, be patient or revenge like [SmokeUpSerling] suggested? cry for mummy...

@charcharr,
[Nucleus] sometimes regretted after forgiving, but always felt very relaxed after forgetting.

@rahman2040,
Let me present my honest view, because I do care for my fellow brothers and sisters.
I think Quran needs more polite interpretations than 'if you don't surrender my terms, I kill you' type hostile communication. Referencing Suras out of context has made trouble globally and Muslims are becoming an easy target to be condemned as rednecks. Islamic scholars must present case-studies using Quran to guide the followers to be friendly towards rest of the world. Otherwise, US will continue invading your valued lifestyle.

Answer:

How to know a=b b=c a=c is true?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216123245AA1bCCU

How to know a=b b=c a=c logical principle of equivalence is true?

In argument, if premises A=B and B=C, you can apply the logical principle of equivalence to conclude that A=C.

"Define a word by repeating the word itself in the definition." is The Error of Circular Definition.

Likewise, the use of premises and conclusions to prove the logical principal is a Circular Error.

Without committing such an error, how to know the logical principle of equivalence is true?

Additional Details

@Wiz,
Oh, Come On!, don't be so narrowed to avoid the big picture in this question.
How do you know the 'must all be identical' part in your comment is true?
How do you prove the principle without using what principle can prove?

@Curtis Edward Clark.com,
Please do not divert from the main question.
You proved an example "apples" by using the logical principle, but why do you believe that the logical principle itself is true?

Dear true wisdom,

The 3 answers so far do not address the question in full.

Lack of complete answers to the question imply, the products of current education system are adamant, not to accept the baseless nature of logical principles, where the said system is assumed to base upon.

If logical principles cannot be proven on solid grounds (without Circular Error), can the applications/ conclusions based on such logical principles be valid? no

Even the existence of 'space' justification has Circular Error: point is defined using line and line is defined using point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_%28geo…
"All definitions are ultimately circular in nature since they depend on concepts which must themselves have definitions, a dependence which can not be continued indefinitely without returning to the starting point."

It is fair to say, the belief in Space in Space-Time continuum is unscientific+illogical and is a result of ignorance.

@nickipettis,
Should we consider 'Aristotelian logic' to be super-mundane like freedom 'nibbana' in Buddhism?

Answer:

behaviors of different imaginary number systems

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216112642AAKcRkx

What are the behaviors of different dimensions of imaginary number systems and their effect to real numbers?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

[δοτζο] commented:
"... We know far more about complex numbers today than they did a couple hundred years ago."

Can you explain the behaviors of different dimensions (up to 10 layers) of the imaginary number systems (wide, deep and parallel wise) and their effect to real numbers using the current comprehensive knowledge you claim to have?

If not, it is unwise to over-estimate the knowledge on the subject.

Fortunately, aforesaid knowledge is available (not in public)

Additional Details

What's wrong with 3/5/6/7?
The knowledge not available in public has no such limits and extends imaginary dimensions to infinity of infinities and their behavior with each other (imaginary to imaginary) are explained.

As fact and with no intention to insult, I think the referenced mathematicians' guess workouts of imaginary numbers are overestimates, like the blind fantasize on color.

Answer:

why Infinity remains as a concept

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216102212AAAKtGn

If Atom can be visually observed why Infinity remains as a concept?

Both concepts Atom 'Paramanu' and Infinity 'Anantha' are sourced back to ancient Asia.

Paramanu=Parama+Anu, means basic unit.
Western Education has given a value to it and claim to visually observe.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba…

The concept of 'Anantha' is defined with relative to universe/self 'vi+sva / shiva'

Western Education system was skeptic to welcome some mathematicians who knew infinity (example: Georg Cantor, Srinivasa Ramanujan, etc)

Cantor was condemned as a "scientific charlatan", a "renegade" and a "corrupter of youth" with no empathy at that time.

Why Infinity remains as a concept in current education system and not used as a definite range from finite to complete/whole when the existence of different infinities are obvious?

Additional Details

@Iggy Rocko,
The Education system teaches things of doubt without mastering them.
As a result, students are forced (brain-washed) to memorize them to earn credits.
When someone with knowledge on the subject says something different, this dump army who call themselves 'mathematicians' declare war to reject, because the truth hurts their comfort.

Even Galileo was found "gravely suspect of heresy" and sentenced to indefinite imprisonment by Roman Catholic Church over his support of Copernican astronomy, because he proved the Earth was not the center of the universe.

Answer:

IEEE western protocols define infinity as a specific value

Question:

Why western protocols define infinity as a specific value in IEEE floating point?

This question is an extension to:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…

Western Education system is confused with the use of Infinity in Mathematics.

IEEE Standard 754 Floating Point Numbers is precise with infinity.
http://steve.hollasch.net/cgindex/coding…

"Infinity
The values +infinity and -infinity are denoted with an exponent of all 1s and a fraction of all 0s. The sign bit distinguishes between negative infinity and positive infinity. Being able to denote infinity as a specific value is useful because it allows operations to continue past overflow situations. Operations with infinite values are well defined in IEEE floating point. "

Additional Details

@Al Bart,
It is certain stupidity, when the reader cannot see the big picture of this question.

How does western math education respond, when western protocols define infinity as a specific value, where the system found a considerable reason for existence to do it?


Answer:

means of UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL justify its ends

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216092739AAwV3U6

Do the means of UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL justify its ends?

Does UNHRC compromise human rights in any means to Uphold the ends of Human Rights?

Answer:

Universe limited in size with potential to expand

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216090847AAUgJMe
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216093138AAunUKz

Is the God created Universe limited in size with potential to expand?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216093406AA24Xxe

Is Mathematical Universe limited in size with potential to grow?

How does meta physics consider the universe?


Answer:

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Computer programming assign values to Infinity

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216083301AAdbqmC

Do Computer programming languages assign values to Infinity like 9999999?

give examples

Answer:

calculations with infinities make any sense

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216081826AA6n38r

Do calculations with infinities make any sense in Mathematics?

concepts like "infinity - 1" or "infinity1 - infinity2"

Additional Details

@SS4,
Does Georg Cantor's "infinity of infinities" make any sense to you?

If the concept of Infinity 'Anantha' is a definable range (not number) and used for Mathematics by ancient Asians, can the short-lived western education system be humble to absorb the true nature of temporal infinity? (Even zero/freedom is new to liberal west 1BC-1AC)

Infinity, Zero, Imaginary numbers, etc are mysteries (difficult or impossible to understand or explain) to Western education system.

Why prejudice (Preconceived opinion not based on reason or experience) of what is unknown, when the same is known to some cultures over thousands of years?

Does Western Education System play the role of "Jack of all trades, master of none"?

Answer:

research judge on writing style

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216081358AAVia9v

Should a research paper be mainly judged on writing style or by its valuable content?

Suppose an author's first language is not English and do not have resources to invest on writing style.

Research findings are valuable and submitted to relevant journals of English medium.

Should a research paper be mainly judged on writing style or by its valuable content?

Is there a compromise for acceptance (with help to optimize) or should the whole thing be rejected, because it lacks grammar?

How does research publishing practically work, especially for Math research?

Additional Details

@imltyww,
See, your reference site costs thousands of dollars to format someone's findings. What does the humble researcher get out of all these money games?

It seems that cost for publishing and inflexible dogmatic rules of journals demoralize research and an insult to knowledge.
Is intelligent researcher or the dumb publisher more important to society? I think it is the publisher's job to corporate with author to tune the paper and make it more presentable to the reader.
It is better to upload research papers at more flexible sites in internet than begging after narrow minded and prejudiced journal editors.

@D.W.,
Do reviewers volunteer their time for nothing? It is true for the researcher as well. Why researchers' efforts are not valued in the first place? Can everyone be perfect in all manners - all the time, other than do what they are good at (to research)?

Where is promotion for new thinking, opportunity to criticize findings and argue them back and forth, when publishers ruthlessly destroy them at birth.

Unless the researcher is associated to a reputable institution, backed up by a financial sponsor, experienced professional or a rich man, no other research can be published. Where are the incentives for home researchers?

This is a major bottle neck for intelligence to grow and in a way suggests 'not so smart is more comfortable'.


Answer:

research paper to be a serious scholarly contribution

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216075053AATNiCl

What are the guidelines for a research paper to be a serious scholarly contribution to the literature?



Answer:

Why Imaginary numbers not clear?

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130216073447AAPkYme

Why the existence of Imaginary numbers still not clearly understood?

http://www.math.toronto.edu/mathnet/ques…

QUOTE
However, the numbers i and -i were called "imaginary" (an unfortunate choice of terminology which has remained to this day), because their existence was still not clearly understood.
END QUOTE

If someone could come up with a good explanation to the above concern,
how would the Mathematics Community and especially the general Public,
appreciate/value such a contribution(s)?

Are there competitions (with incentive prizes) for aforesaid Imaginary number concern,
in the likes of Clay Math Millennium Prize Problems?

Additional Details

@δοτζο,
Can you explain the behaviors of different dimensions of the imaginary number systems (wide, deep and parallel wise) and their effect to real numbers using the current comprehensive knowledge you claim to have?
If not, it is unwise to over-estimate the knowledge on the subject.


Answer:

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Cosmological argument prove God exists

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130212143950AAe4r5K

Can the Cosmological argument prove God exists?


For instance, we can see from our senses that things in life are moving, now whatever is moved must be from another external force which influences that move. For instance, fire (the external force) making the wood hot. Then there needs to be a external force to the fire, ie something that causes it to become alight. Do you accept that these changes go back to infinity? Aquinas believed that there must have been a first prime mover, who has always existed in order for us to exist now, and God is the cause of all motion/change. Also, Aquinas in his cosmological argument for God's existence thinks that if time is infinite, nothing would exist now. We can see that things that exist are contingent, ie they are born and then later cease to exist, therefore nothing can be brought into existence through themselves. For instance, we can't exist before we existed. Thus, as everything that exists now is contingent, and time was infinite, then nothing would exist now because there must have been a time where nothing existed, and as contingent beings cannot bring themselves into existence there must have been a God that brought about our existence. Science also supports this argument as things such as the universe expanding proves that the universe must have had a starting point.

The universe seems finely balanced too, think about the planck constant and the gravitational constant, just a slight change would mean that life itself would not exist at all, so there seems to be an intelligent designer.



Answer:
Cosmological argument explains the creation, not creator.
Neither character of a story nor the whole story can prove it's author.

The conventional external world one feels, is truly mind made (mental pictures).
Therefore, creator dwells in mind.

Aquinas is a thinker and argues within the thought matrix.

Simply, mind cannot handle what is unthinkable, including freedom from thoughts.

Source(s):

God of Gods' Eyes

prove that God does not exist

Question:
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130213000206AA9yZso

Atheists: is it possible to prove that God does not exist?


Answer:

I answer on the basis that this question is open to anyone, and not limited to the category of 'atheists'.

It is possible to scientifically prove that a PERMANENT creator God does not exist, where existence of such creator is caused by ignorance (non science).
'Avijja-paccaya sankhara'

In Buddhist cosmology 'Maha brahma' regard himself as the all-powerful, all-seeing creator of the Universe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_co…

Therefore, Buddhism has dealt with the permanent creator god concept and found freedom from such ignorance, with the use of true-science 'vijja'.

Do you need more proof to say that God does not exist with respect to science?

@idlenessss,
If you think (1+1=2) and (2 is not =3), then you can prove that (1+1 is not =3).

Source(s):

God of Gods' Eyes