Sunday, March 24, 2013

yahoo delete challenging question to science


Why did yahoo delete challenging question to science?

A copy of the question is as follows:…

I received following message from yahoo:

Hello Nucleus,
The question on Yahoo! Answers was reported and deleted by one or more trusted members of the Answers community:
"Can science sensibly prove the existence of Magnetic Force?"
This question has been removed and 10 points have been deducted from your account. You may not have realized this, but all questions submitted on Yahoo! Answers must comply with the Answers Community Guidelines.
If you believe that your questionwas wrongly deleted by the community and would like to appeal the deletion of your question, you can have your case reviewed by Answers Customer Care. You have 7 days to submit your appeal. Please be aware that if your appeal is rejected, an additional 10 points will be removed from your account.
Appeal this decision:…
Yahoo! Answers Team

My reply to Yahoo:

Hello dumb Yahoo Answers Team,
How do you expect me to 'Appeal your decision' when I did not receive a complaint?
1. What are the precise reasons for deleting "Can science sensibly prove the existence of Magnetic Force?" question (what exact guidance/acts are breached?).
2. Who complained it?
3. What was the intention for complaining?
This is not the first time I made you aware of your dumb deletion-appealing system.
It is reasonable for intelligence to reject absurdity of such decisions and follow-up.

The deletion procedure should not be cheating.

    Additional Details

    Who did the coward act to report such an intellectually challenging question?

    @MTR 2.0,
    This question is philosophical and in correct category. 'offended some one' is a pseudo reasoning.
    When I ask a question, others can answer. Why should I prove anything?
    Were you the offender to report ?

    @Professor Freedom,
    I ask a question the way I like it and is open for others to answer. If some people are easily offended, it is their sensitive problem, not mine, because I have no intentions to offend anyone.
    I completely reject the absurdity of deletion system, and not worried about the contests of my question.

    So far Yahoo deleted many of my questions, and still I do not know the exact reasons.……
    and more..
    If no accurate complaint, expecting to appeal is a joke.

    @Houston, we have a problem,
    I cannot agree with your assumption.

    I suggest any researcher to skim through other yahoo questions and answers to evaluate the consistency of decision making in deleting.

    If your guys see me as a threat, and always get offended, I will not post any more questions with yahoo, and will find elsewhere, to continue my intellectual research.


    western sciences consider objective and subjective factors


    Why do western sciences consider objective and subjective factors?

    Objective and subjective consideration is to accept 'creator concept', the basis for religions.


    How do western sciences accept objective relativity


    How do western sciences accept objective relativity after Galileo's suggestion?

    real knowledge, real objective world, real laws of objective world, etc are the sole/belief/precondition of western sciences.

    Galileo was punished by the church for suggesting 'observation is relative' by saying 'Earth move around the Sun'.

    'objective relativity' shook the 'objective real' foundation of western sciences.

    'relative observations' shifted 'western sciences' into 'relative sciences', degrading the credibility of 'real' belief of existence.

    How do western scientists cope with such instability?
    Can they enjoy making sand castles, where the tide can wash them off easily?


    Why 2 = 1 is mathematical fallacy?


    Why 2 = 1 is mathematical fallacy?

    This question extends from:…

    Mathematics is valid only for worldly existence (mundane 'lokika').
    Mathematics cannot exist in non-existence.

    Therefore, 0 (zero) should exist as an infinitesimal.

    But, the existing infinitesimal value (from a subjective universe) as zero may not be emphasized in mathematics, due to 'precision' concern.…
    2 = 1 proof

    1 x 0 = 0
    2 x 0 = 0
    therefore, 1 x 0 = 2 x 0
    cut zeros from both sides,

    Correct calculation is:

    Let, 0 (zero) = Δ (infinitesimal)
    If 1 = 1 + Δ then, 2 = 2(1 + Δ) = 2 + Δ2

    (1+Δ) x Δ = 1Δ+Δ^2 = Δa

    (2+Δ) x Δ = 2Δ+Δ^2 = Δb

    Δa != (not equal) Δb

    1=2 is a fallacy.

    Additional Details

    "The mathematician Brahmagupta was the first to attempt to divide with zero, and thus the first to treat zero as an actual number rather than as just a placeholder or other identifier."

    Don't you have any respect to the recommendations of the pioneer of math-zero 'Brahmagupta'?

    This is why I already proved in many ways in other questions, that 'current education system' is false and western (not-original) thinking in incomplete.


    non-existence cannot be referenced with existing logic


    Why non-existence cannot be referenced with existing logic?

    Definition of 'non-existence' exists and in not non-existence.

    For example;

    If 0 (zero) is infinitesimal existence,
    then 5+0 = 5

    If 0 is non-existence,
    then 5 + 0 = 0

    Whatever existence you throw into non-existence cannot exist.

    Free from existence (nibbana) cannot be referenced by worldly existence!.

    Creator based western thinking cannot grasp 'nibbana' in Buddhism.…

    Can you logically reference non-existence?

    Additional Details

    You cannot think non-existence, but can experience it.

    For example:

    (imagine x-y Cartesian diagram)…

    Let dimension-x is exclusive to dimension-y.
    Then dimension-x does not exist (non-existent) within dimension-y.

    @come closer, smell this !,
    Thank you for sharing your experience with us.


    science sensibly prove the existence of Magnetic Force


    Can science sensibly prove the existence of Magnetic Force?

    When experimenting with iron filings and magnets, we can observe the pattern of iron filings to assume magnetic force.…

    "A magnetic field is a mathematical description of the magnetic influence of electric currents and magnetic materials."…

    Therefore, 'magnetic field' concept is a fictionally created story, used to explain the aforesaid observations. We can create many alternative fictional stories to justify observations.

    Since 'magnetic field' cannot be observed by senses (not empirical evidence), how scientifically stable is 'magnetic field' concept?

    Scientific evidence is expected to be empirical evidence (sense experience) and in accordance with scientific method.…

    Additional Details

    The underlying question is, how scientific is science when creationism in involved?

    @Dr Redthumb,
    How scientific is inference/relation of 'magnetic field' from/to the observations of iron filings, in the first place? Also, Science as a 'subject' taught at school, seems to reference a superior existence.

    @D g,
    Good luck, if you can see magnetic fields. Do you use a microscope to see them?
    3 hours ago
    You stated: Creativity (NOT "creationism") is actually involved in science.
    'Magnetic Force lines' are creativity, the blind belief in science. Confirmed!

    Scientific method is to conclude if (observations=hypothesis) condition is true or false. It cannot create new knowledge.
    (interpretations of observations=hypothesis) is abuse of scientific method, because interpretation is not equal to observation and interpretation always creates new knowledge. (unscientific method)

    @Chris Pitchr,
    approximation invalidates scientific method.
    (if observation=0.9999.. and conclusion=1.0, then the experiment abuses scientific method)

    quantum mechanics, particle physics, relativity, etc are man created stories. no difference to creating the concept of God who creates everything.

    @Tim S,
    If non-testable belief is a precondition of science, how scientific is science, irrespective of prejudice?


    ignorance makes attachment to believe in non-existing existence


    Why ignorance makes attachment to believe in non-existing existence?

    This question extends from:…

    Additional Details

    The question is accurate if there's a comma after attachment. Attachment/relationship is also created. The question does not limit attachment or belief to people.

    @Fake Genius,
    Cannot agree with your definition 'mind that has no idea is ignorant'.
    Ignorance 'moha' is lack of knowledge on greed 'lobha' (attraction/induction/unification) and hatred 'dvesa' (repulsion/derivations/separation) and their consequence of existence.